Physical Qubit Counts by Leading Machine
Largest published physical qubit count for each company's latest gate-model machine, colored by modality. Neutral-atom systems now scale to the most qubits, but raw count is not comparable across modalities and says little on its own about usable computation.
Neutral-atomSuperconductingTrapped-ionSilicon spinTopological
Best Two-Qubit Gate Fidelity by Company
Best reported two-qubit gate fidelity, the cleanest single quality metric. Trapped ions and silicon spin lead. Fault tolerance generally needs roughly 99.9 percent or better sustained across a full device.
Silicon spinTrapped-ionSuperconductingNeutral-atom
Qubit Modalities Compared
The competing physical approaches to building a qubit, each with different economics, scaling physics, and maturity. No modality has clearly won as of mid-2026.
| Modality | Leaders |
|---|---|
| Superconducting | IBM, Google, Rigetti, IQM, OQC |
| Trapped-ion | Quantinuum, IonQ |
| Neutral-atom | QuEra, Pasqal, Atom Computing, Infleqtion |
| Photonic | PsiQuantum, Xanadu, Quandela |
| Silicon spin | Intel, SQC, Diraq, Quobly |
| Topological | Microsoft |
| Annealing | D-Wave |
| Diamond NV | Quantum Brilliance |
Logical Qubits and Fault-Tolerance Roadmaps
Where each leader stands on error-corrected logical qubits today and what it has committed to deliver. Logical qubits, not raw physical counts, are the metric that gates fault tolerance, and target years are vendor-stated and have slipped before.
| Company | Logical qubits today | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Quantinuum | 48 error-corrected logical qubits (Helios) | 2030 |
| QuEra (with Harvard) | 96 logical qubits | ~2030 |
| Atom Computing + Microsoft | 28 logical qubits | ~2027 |
| Below-threshold error suppression (Willow) | ~2030s | |
| IBM | qLDPC prototype (Loon) | 2029 |
| IonQ | ~100 physical qubits (Tempo) | 2030 |
| PsiQuantum | Manufacturable chipset (Omega) | 2027 |