Quantum Computing Market by Company

Quantum computing is moving from physics experiment to a commercializing industry, with a wave of 2026 public listings and the first merchant quantum foundries. This sector tracks the public pure-plays, the diversified incumbents, and the major private players across the competing qubit modalities, the hardware supply chain, applications, and the post-quantum-cryptography threat that is forcing a mandated migration regardless of when the hardware matures.

Data updated 2026-08-24
Quantum

The Quantum sector on Sterling tracks 30 companies, led by IonQ (67%), Quantinuum (16%), D-Wave Quantum (12.9%) by share of FY2025 revenue across the five public quantum pure-plays, excluding the diversified incumbents.

Quantum market share by company (2025)

#CompanyMarket share
1
IonQIONQ

Share of FY2025 revenue across the five public quantum hardware pure-plays that report revenue. The diversified incumbents on this roster (IBM, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, Intel, Honeywell) lead the field on capability but do not break out quantum revenue, so they are outside this denominator. FY2025 revenue $130.0M. Management said more than 60 percent was commercial; the remainder includes government and other. An exact government split is not broken out.

67%
2

FY2025 revenue $31M. Trapped-ion systems; majority-owned by Honeywell, which also appears on this roster as a diversified incumbent.

16%
3

FY2025 revenue $25M. Annealing and gate-model systems; the FY2025 step-up is largely a single on-premises system sale.

12.9%
4

FY2025 revenue $7M. Superconducting systems; revenue fell year over year as system sales slipped.

3.6%
5

FY2025 revenue $1M. Photonics and thin-film lithium niobate; revenue is negligible against a multi-billion-dollar market value.

0.5%

Quantum Headline KPIs

A handful of sourced numbers that frame the sector. Forecast ranges and expert likelihoods are ranges, not point estimates. Qubit-count rows are labeled as vendor claims or published experiments.
2025 private investment
$12.6B
6.3 times the prior year. McKinsey says roughly 97 percent was private rather than government capital.
McKinsey QTM 2026
IonQ FY2025 revenue
$130.0M
Largest listed hardware pure-play. The company said more than 60 percent was commercial. Not a sector total.
IonQ FY2025 results
DARPA QBI Stage B
11 teams
Advanced November 2025. A credibility screen for a utility-scale machine by 2033, not a funding ranking.
DARPA
Willow error suppression Λ
2.14
Neural-network decoder. Logical error fell as surface-code distance rose. Memory experiment, not a product.
Nature, Dec 2024
Logical qubits (Nature)
96
Harvard, MIT, and QuEra: up to 96 distance-4 logical qubits active at once. Not comparable to other encodings.
Nature, Jan 2026
Helios error-corrected LQ
48
Vendor claim, November 2025. 98 physical qubits at a stated 2:1 encoding. Also claims 94 error-detected, a different metric.
Quantinuum (claim)
Federal civilian PQC ROM
$7.1B
OMB/ONCD, 2024 dollars, prioritized non-NSS systems, 2025 to 2035. National-security systems are outside this number.
OMB / ONCD, Jul 2024
CRQC within 15 years
51 to 70%
Global Risk Institute 2025 survey of 26 experts. Averaged likelihood, not a scheduled date. Within 10 years: 28 to 49%.
GRI 2025

Private Investment in Quantum Startups by Year

Annual private investment into quantum-computing startups. 2025 marked a step change to $12.6B, a 6.3 times jump over the prior year, with roughly 97 percent of it private rather than government capital (McKinsey Quantum Technology Monitor).

Quantum Market Forecasts (and Why They Disagree)

The headline forecasts span orders of magnitude because they measure different things. Vendor-revenue forecasts land in the low tens of billions by 2030; economic-value-at-stake forecasts reach hundreds of billions to trillions and are far more speculative. Read each against its metric and year.
SourceWhat it measuresYearEstimate
MarketsandMarketsVendor revenue2030$20B
IDCCustomer spending2027~$8.6B
McKinseyQuantum-computing market2035$43B to $71B
McKinseyTotal quantum-tech market2035$60B to $100B
BCGVendor market2040$90B to $170B
BCGEconomic value at stake2040$450B to $850B
McKinseyEconomic value at stake2035$1.3T to $2.7T

Cash, Burn and Runway for the Pure-Plays

The financial reality behind the technology roadmaps. Most of these companies book almost no revenue, so what matters is how much cash they hold and how fast they spend it. Runway is a mechanical ratio at the current burn, not a prediction: every name here has raised before and can raise again.

IONQ

4.8y

runway

QUBT

23.5y

runway

QBTS

5.8y

runway

LAES

10.7y

runway

RGTI

5.1y

runway

ARQQ

0.7y

runway

Share Count Growth at the Pure-Plays

How that cash gets raised. Three of the four legacy pure-plays have roughly tripled their share count since 2022, so an investor who held throughout owns about a third of the business they started with. This is the cost of a long research timeline funded from the equity market.

IONQ

197.7M to 371.2M

1.9x more shares

RGTI

102.1M to 335.4M

3.3x more shares

QBTS

113.4M to 367.5M

3.2x more shares

QUBT

52M to 162.4M

3.1x more shares

Balance Sheet vs Trailing Revenue

Cash and investments as a multiple of annual revenue, on a log scale. The ratios run from roughly 10 times to 250 times, which is the plainest way to see that these are research programmes financed by investors rather than businesses funded by customers.

Cash and short-term investments as a multiple of trailing-twelve-month revenue. A log scale: each gridline is ten times the last, because the range runs from roughly 10x to 250x.

Public-Equity Universe

How the names on this roster cluster: listed hardware pure-plays, post-quantum security, diversified incumbents, private leaders, and Entity List names shown only for completeness. A map, not a recommendation.

Public hardware pure-plays

Listed companies whose primary disclosed business is quantum computing hardware or closely related systems. Revenue is still small against the valuations the market assigns them.

IonQIONQUS
Rigetti ComputingRGTIUS
D-Wave QuantumQBTSUS
Quantum Computing IncQUBTUS
QuantinuumQNTUS
XanaduXNDUCA
InfleqtionINFQUS
IQM Quantum ComputersIQMXFI
Horizon QuantumHQSG

Public post-quantum security

Listed names selling quantum-safe cryptography or hardware. This is the regulation-driven adjacency, not a hardware bet.

Arqit QuantumARQQGB
SEALSQLAESCH

Diversified incumbents

Quantum is a program or a stake inside a much larger company. Parent revenue is not quantum revenue. Honeywell's exposure is primarily its Quantinuum holding.

IBMIBMUS
Alphabet (Google Quantum AI)GOOGLUS
MicrosoftMSFTUS
Amazon (AWS)AMZNUS
NvidiaNVDAUS
IntelINTCUS
HoneywellHONUS

Private leaders (not listed)

Shown because they set technical or capital benchmarks. They are not public-equity tickers.

PsiQuantumprivateUS
SandboxAQprivateUS
PasqalprivateFR
QuEra ComputingprivateUS
Atom ComputingprivateUS
Oxford Quantum CircuitsprivateGB
Alice & BobprivateFR
Silicon Quantum ComputingprivateAU
Quantum BrillianceprivateAU
Quantum MachinesprivateIL

Uninvestable (US Entity List)

On the page for completeness. Added in the May 2024 Entity List wave. Not investable for US persons.

Origin QuantumprivateEntity ListCN
QuantumCTekprivateEntity ListCN

Sector Milestones

Dated events that changed what a reader can say about hardware, policy, cryptography, applications, or public capital. Vendor claims are labeled.
Dec 2018
PolicyUS Congress

National Quantum Initiative Act signed (P.L. 115-368).

Created the statutory frame for NIST, NSF, and DOE quantum programs. Some R&D authorizations later expired; reauthorization is still pending as of August 2026.

Nov 2022
CryptographyOMB

Memorandum M-23-02 directs agencies to inventory quantum-vulnerable cryptography.

The inventory requirement is what later produced the $7.1B civilian ROM. Migration planning started before a cryptographically relevant machine exists.

Jul 2024
CryptographyOMB / ONCD

Report to Congress: $7.1B rough order of magnitude for prioritized federal civilian PQC, 2025 to 2035.

2024 dollars. National-security systems are a separate unpublished track.

Aug 2024
CryptographyNIST

First three post-quantum FIPS finalized (ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SLH-DSA).

Gave agencies and vendors a standard to implement. Deadlines in other mandates now have an algorithm set.

Dec 2024
HardwareGoogle

Willow: below-threshold surface-code memory published in Nature (Λ = 2.14).

First processor where encoded error fell as the code grew. A memory experiment, not a utility-scale machine.

Sep 2025
ApplicationsHSBC / IBM

Bond-trading research trial: up to 34% better fill-probability prediction on European corporate-bond RFQ data.

The strongest quantified finance result on production-scale data. Historical trial, not live trading.

Nov 2025
HardwareQuantinuum

Helios commercial launch. Vendor claim: 98 physical qubits and 48 error-corrected logical qubits.

A company specification, not an independent reproduction. Error-detected counts (94) are a different metric.

Nov 2025
PolicyDARPA

Quantum Benchmarking Initiative advances 11 teams to Stage B.

A sophisticated buyer asking whether any approach can reach utility-scale by 2033. Selection is a credibility signal, not a contract award ranking.

CY 2025
CapitalMcKinsey QTM

Private investment into quantum startups printed at $12.6B.

A 6.3 times jump over 2024, with roughly 97 percent private rather than government capital.

Jan 2026
HardwareHarvard / MIT / QuEra

Nature paper: up to 96 distance-4 logical qubits active at once on a 448-atom processor.

Published experiment using [[16,6,4]] codes. Not a leaderboard against Helios or Willow encodings.

Feb 2026
CapitalInfleqtion

First listed neutral-atom company (SPAC).

Part of the 2026 listing wave that widened the public-equity map beyond the four legacy pure-plays.

Mar 2026
CapitalXanadu / Horizon Quantum

Photonic and software-led names list via SPAC.

Adds public tickers in photonics (XNDU) and quantum software tools (HQ).

Apr 2026
PolicyUS Senate Commerce

S.3597, National Quantum Initiative reauthorization, ordered reported.

About $2.7B authorized for NIST, NSF, and NASA over five years if enacted. Not appropriated spend. Not law as of August 2026.

May 2026
PolicyCommerce / IBM / GlobalFoundries

Proposed CHIPS letters of intent for merchant quantum foundries (Anderon $1B; GF QTS $375M).

LOIs, not closed awards. Manufacturing bets, not QPU performance claims.

Jun 2026
CapitalQuantinuum

IPO, the first major trapped-ion listing (ticker QNT).

Honeywell remains the majority owner. Adds a high-fidelity trapped-ion name to the public roster.

NISQ Reality vs Fault-Tolerant Targets

What exists on noisy intermediate-scale machines versus what requires error-corrected hardware that does not yet exist at scale. A frame, not a forecast. Roadmap years cited elsewhere are vendor-stated.
LayerWhat it is
Physical qubitsThe raw quantum devices. Counts are not comparable across superconducting, ion, atom, and photonic hardware.
Logical qubitsError-protected qubits encoded in many physical qubits. Encoding, detection versus correction, and memory versus circuit all differ.
ApplicationsWhat customers can buy or trial today versus what slideware promises after fault tolerance.
CryptographyThe threat that does not wait for a large machine. Harvest-now-decrypt-later is already a planning assumption.
Commercial revenueWhat listed hardware companies actually book.
Policy spendPublic programs that fund research, foundries, and cryptography migration on government clocks.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Quantum sector?

Quantum computing is moving from physics experiment to a commercializing industry, with a wave of 2026 public listings and the first merchant quantum foundries. This sector tracks the public pure-plays, the diversified incumbents, and the major private players across the competing qubit modalities, the hardware supply chain, applications, and the post-quantum-cryptography threat that is forcing a mandated migration regardless of when the hardware matures.

Which companies lead the Quantum sector?

Sterling tracks 30 companies in Quantum, led by IonQ (67%), Quantinuum (16%), D-Wave Quantum (13%), Rigetti Computing (4%) and Quantum Computing Inc (1%) by share of FY2025 revenue across the five public quantum pure-plays, excluding the diversified incumbents.

How can I invest in the Quantum sector?

Publicly traded names in Quantum include IonQ (IONQ), Rigetti Computing (RGTI), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Quantum Computing Inc (QUBT) and Quantinuum (QNT). Compare them side by side on Sterling. Data last updated August 24, 2026.

Sterling

Prefer Sterling in Google

Add sterlingcharts.com as a preferred source so our charts can appear with a preferred badge in Google Top Stories, AI Mode, and AI Overviews.

Add as preferred source

Ask Sterling

Register for a premium account to gain access to Sterling AI.

Get Started

Things you can ask Sterling:

Summarize Tesla's latest earnings reportWhy did NVIDIA's margins expand?Compare Apple vs Microsoft's cash flowWhat's driving EV industry growth?
Menu
Favorites